By Teachers, For Teachers
As an educator for over twenty years, I’ve witnessed numerous initiatives to improve the quality of education. With the introduction of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), I think we are finally emerging from a more “Standards Abused” era in education.
I am not naïve enough to believe that the CCSS are going to cure everything that challenges teaching and learning in our classrooms. However, I am optimistic that CCSS is a vehicle for us (educators) to go back to what we all first knew.
What we all first knew is that good and effective teaching is not rooted in multiple-choice tests. Instead, student achievement is a result of effective teaching that is based on research, sound pedagogical practices, and theory. CCSS also recognizes that teachers are the best ones to decide the most effective teaching methodologies for reaching the rigorous expectations of this new set of standards. It is time for us to get back to what we know, as educators, what are the best ways in which we can teach our students.
CCSS is a vehicle for us to get back to what we know is best for our students.
How CCSS Gets Back to Quality Instruction
When I work in schools across the United States and talk to teachers about what good instruction looks like, I will hear comments like:
Once I have this discussion with teachers, we recognize that we do know the most effective strategies for students to learn, comprehend , and develop important skills sets, I draw their attention to the Common Core State Standards.
Complementary Aspect of the Common Core State Standards:
1. Did you notice that many of the Standards require students to represent what they know and understand through different contexts? Therefore we could never rely on multiple choice tests as a sole assessment because this instrument is only ONE way in which students can represent what they know and understand. Inquiry based projects and assessments would meet this expectation in CCSS.
2. The CCSS outline what college and career readiness looks like for individual students through clearly articulated expectations. These expectations echo our conversation that effective good teaching and learning is rooted in differentiated instruction.
3. The fact that the CCSS authors clearly articulate that it is teachers and curriculum specialists who are the BEST and most knowledgeable about how students can reach the rigorous expectations of these standards is huge.
Tips for Teachers to Transition to the Common Core State Standards
We do know in our heads and hearts what effective teaching and learning looks like for our students. Talking to each other and sharing ideas and information is also important as we make this transition to Common Core State Standards. CCSS is a vehicle that gives us the structure and the flexibility to manifest exciting and effective classrooms for the 21st century.
What did we miss? Share other CCSS need-to-know info in the comments section!
Comments
Gretchen A. Steele
Wed, 2012-02-22 10:09
CCS supports text book best practice and replaces the convoluted state standards here in Illinois. It is readily apparent savvy educators created these standards which can be implemented in endless fashion: the how of learning is upfront with the what more flexible.
Ann
Thu, 2012-02-23 09:48
What concerns me is the digital text/technology component. Our computer lab is 10 years old and on an average day only 20 of the mobile lab computers work. We are told of course no money is available to update these for the future. Once again I am afraid that we have unfunded mandates with no thought as to how we are realistically going to put this into practice.
Mrell
Sun, 2012-02-26 09:35
Ann I totally agree with you on the technology component. We have new updated computers, but they are being used most of the time by the school having "computer class". It's difficult to get my classes into the computer lab during my class periods. If we don;t have access to these things, how can we put these "great", "awesome", and "21st century" practices into place? As everything these standards are made with the best possible expectations in a perfect world type setting. I think as educators we need to be a little more realistic with these.
Stephen Stollmack
Wed, 2012-02-29 00:36
The idea of standardization is the very antithesis of education, so what are we really talking about, anyway? The issue is and has always been about getting the resources that you need to keep pace with advances in technology. Common Core Standards are a smoke screen to distract you from the real meaning of the word "standards". ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), representing big business and the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development), struggling with the issue of how to keep the world populations from rising up when they realize how the 1% have stolen their resources, want education standardized in order to minimize free thinking and innovative teaching. Industrial Corporations need compliant and non-questioning workers to fill the low and middle-level jobs. Check out http://unitedoptout.com/global-outreachstate-by-state/.
Wayne in Kuwait
Sat, 2012-03-03 21:17
From an international teaching perspective the CCSS are being adopted by many schools overseas as well as a means of ensuring continuity from one school to the next for families that are constantly on the move - think diplomatic, state department, defense families as some examples.
Providing this continuity from international school to international school with standards that are found now throughout America alleviates parental concerns about the quality of education when having to leave America for overseas postings. They know that they can find an equivalent education for their children regardless of location if the institution has adopted the CCSS and also making a transition back home is easier.
Nicky
Sun, 2012-03-25 21:28
These new CCSS do have an increased emphasis on literacy skills, and unfortunatel I have an increased number of 7th graders who are reading 3 or more grade levels behind. Now what? My school is facing the largest # of failures we've probably ever had. This due to our new rigorous standards and their TCAP being 15% of their final, which I absolutely agree with. I just think, here in TN, we are doing too much in little time.
Add new comment